Home > Javascript Error > Javascript Error Security Manager Vetoed Action

Javascript Error Security Manager Vetoed Action

I'm using Firefox 3.6.10 and the latest Greasemonkey extension. For this reason, scripts are executed in a sandbox and this API cannot abused. When is it okay to exceed the absolute maximum rating on a part? Comment 15 Brian Crowder 2008-05-16 08:37:14 PDT John: What were you trying to evalInSandbox? have a peek here

This problem didnt occur to previous version. I believe what the code tried to do with FF is doing something that is (or used to be from FF15) illegal from FF security perspective. Any hints? (The code works in FF3b4 and FF2). Log in or register to post comments Add child issue, clone issue News itemsDrupal news Planet Drupal Association news Social media directory Security announcements Jobs Our communityCommunity Getting involved Services, Training

subscribe Log in or register to post comments Comment #4 andypost CreditAttribution: andypost commented January 25, 2011 at 7:04am subscribe Log in or register to post comments Comment #5 SepehrLajevardi CreditAttribution: The "keeps it" manifests as the VETO error. Last Comment Bug423890 - Message 'Security Manager vetoed action' does not have enough information Summary: Message 'Security Manager vetoed action' does not have enough information Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE Whiteboard: [firebug-p3] Keywords: Reference material:http://wiki.greasespot.net/UnsafeWindow#Alternatives_to_unsafeWindow Specifically, at least the "Review" function is broken (that appears next to patches) and the "Create commit message" function (and others, probably) appears wonky - basically, the styles don't

Has anybody had this problem and how to fix this ? Closing... Who is the highest-grossing debut director? Comment 16 John J.

I reinstalled Firefox to no avail. Comment 4 John J. Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug. Firebug-as-chrome sets win.__scope__ to contain some privileged (?) helper functions, and then runs evalInSandbox("with (win.__scope__) cmdlinescript").

Comment 13 Brian Crowder 2008-04-11 17:34:51 PDT *** Bug 421583 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Comment 14 John J. D3D10 Layers+OOMAllocationSize: 58ProductID: {ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}ProductName: FirefoxReleaseChannel: releaseSecondsSinceLastCrash: 324StartupTime: 1379738760SystemMemoryUsePercentage: 81Theme: classic/1.0Throttleable: 1TotalVirtualMemory: 4294836224Vendor: MozillaVersion: 22.0Winsock_LSP: MSAFD Tcpip [TCP/IP] : 2 : 1 : %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll MSAFD Tcpip [UDP/IP] : 2 : 2 : Reload to refresh your session. It is very annoying.

As soon as I insert that line right after the metadata header, the error console throws out a "Security Manager vetoed action" indicating this exact line of code. Can you give an example of it > behaving differently from, f.e., a script element inserted in the page? Any help? · actions · 2013-Sep-16 12:17 am · Wily_OnePremium Memberjoin:2002-11-24San Jose, CA Wily_One Premium Member 2013-Sep-16 12:36 am Re: Firefox problem "Error Security Manaher Vetoed Action&qv3.6.28? After you call eIS, wrap the sandbox in a SJOW if you want to peek at it more, and wrap the eIS return in a SJOW. (See nsProxyAutoConfig.js via mxr for

I don't understand it and it does not reproduce the environment of the web page even with the __scope__ additions. http://canondrivebh.com/javascript-error/javascript-error-45.html I assume you can't really make a testcase available that would demonstrate the problem, right? Comment 5 Mike Shaver (:shaver -- probably not reading bugmail closely) 2008-03-24 09:15:49 PDT What do you mean by "does not reproduce the environment of the web page"? For example, > http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/2008-03-28-04-mozilla1.8.0/ > > has builds from March 28, 2008.

I disabled the addons in FF Safe Mode. I've contributed to FF before, and it is good to note they often change their security policies as the web and HTML5 evolved. –Steven Aug 30 '12 at 18:51 add a What happens to articles when dealing with abbrevations? http://canondrivebh.com/javascript-error/javascript-error-ie6.html Barton 2009-10-27 13:59:46 PDT I guess the resolution should be wontfix, there is no patch and no test that it works now.

Browse other questions tagged jquery jquery-ui firefox file-upload firebug or ask your own question. Anyone else getting this? Anyway, yes, we definitely need a better error message, distinct from 307984's line number woes.

It is fixed in jQuery-UI 1.8.21 share|improve this answer edited Aug 30 '12 at 18:34 answered Aug 30 '12 at 17:55 Steven 925516 Is there any workaround you know

Barton 2008-03-24 09:34:28 PDT I'd have to go back and take out the __scope__ to remember all of the issues with evalInSandbox. Conditional summation How to create a company culture that cares about information security? For reference, the ticket related to this commit (i.e. Comment 8 John J.

Current version is 23.0.1. · actions · 2013-Sep-16 12:36 am · justin..needs sleepModjoin:1999-05-282031 justin to peggypwr1 Mod 2013-Sep-16 12:53 am to peggypwr1Re: Firefox problem "Error Security Manaher Vetoed Action"It is security If the message had been "content can't access __scope__" I would not have submitted this bug report. more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed http://canondrivebh.com/javascript-error/how-to-fix-javascript-errors.html I would like to find a work-around for these issues.

What is a Waterfall Word™? 2002 research: speed of light slowing down? It is very annoying. The code that does this looks like this: var elem = document.getElementById(id); netscape.security.PrivilegeManager .enablePrivilege("UniversalXPConnect"); var doc = elem.contentDocument; doc.open(); doc.write(html); doc.close(); Ever since Firefox this code fails. I reinstalled Firefox to no avail.

Comments Comment #1 SepehrLajevardi CreditAttribution: SepehrLajevardi commented January 23, 2011 at 6:11pm I confirm, same here. What > part of the web page's environment -- of which we agree that __scope__ isn't a > part, right? -- isn't being reflected? Reverting to a previous version fixes this issue. It will become the global scope object when you pass it to evalInSandbox(text, sandbox)." Therefore it would seem to me that if you want the text to be evaluated in the

Could winds of up to 150 km/h impact the structural loads on a Boeing 777? At the arrow box >>> type "var a;" enter-key Actual Results: Exception as above. evalInSandbox fails with "Security Manager vetoed action". You should absolutely keep using eIS if you're going to run code in the context of a web page.

It fails in and I would like to find a work-around for these issues. If it does, we can mostly forget about the patch in #577412: Chrome support Log in or register to post comments Comment #3 Kars-T CreditAttribution: Kars-T commented January 24, 2011 at Barton 2008-03-19 09:57:30 PDT User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9b4) Gecko/2008030317 Firefox/3.0b4 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9b4) Gecko/2008030317 Firefox/3.0b4 With FF3.0b5pre and Firebug

Log in or register to post comments Comment #8 sun CreditAttribution: sun commented April 17, 2011 at 11:21pm @Sepehr Lajevardi: I wanted to thank you once more for this incredibly useful Barton 2008-03-19 10:01:06 PDT I tried to make a smaller test case before filing this report but I was unsuccessful. It's really odd that you're getting NS_ERROR_XPC_SECURITY_MANAGER_VETO after that.